<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"> 
	<channel> 
		<title><![CDATA[TheMediaBriefing - Latest David Banks News]]></title>
		<link>http://www.themediabriefing.com/author/david-banks/rss</link> 
		<description>TheMediaBriefing</description> 
		<language>en-us</language> 
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 04:09:53 GMT</pubDate> 
		 
				<item> 
			<title><![CDATA[Has an affair undermined Leveson? | Rob Wilson and David Banks]]></title> 
			<link><![CDATA[http://www.themediabriefing.com/article/2013-04-26/has-an-affair-undermined-leveson-rob-wilson-and-david-banks]]></link> 
			<description><![CDATA[Rob Wilson MP and David Banks discuss whether an affair between lawyers has compromised the Leveson inquiry.]]></description> 
			<pubDate>Tue, May 21st 2013, 04:09 GMT</pubDate> 
			<guid><![CDATA[http://www.themediabriefing.com/article/2013-04-26/has-an-affair-undermined-leveson-rob-wilson-and-david-banks]]></guid>
			<source><![CDATA[http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2013/apr/26/has-affair-undermined-leveson]]></source>
					</item> 
		 
				<item> 
			<title><![CDATA[Oscar Pistorius: media unlikely to be in contempt, but could be libellous]]></title> 
			<link><![CDATA[http://www.themediabriefing.com/article/2013-02-15/oscar-pistorius-media-unlikely-to-be-in-contempt-but-could-be-libellous]]></link> 
			<description><![CDATA[Twitter and press reaction to the athlete's murder charge must balance freedom of expression with the right to a fair trial.]]></description> 
			<pubDate>Tue, May 21st 2013, 04:09 GMT</pubDate> 
			<guid><![CDATA[http://www.themediabriefing.com/article/2013-02-15/oscar-pistorius-media-unlikely-to-be-in-contempt-but-could-be-libellous]]></guid>
			<source><![CDATA[http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2013/feb/15/oscar-pistorius-media-contempt-libel]]></source>
															<category domain="companies"><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
								<category domain="products"><![CDATA[Daily Mail]]></category>
								<category domain="people"><![CDATA[Oscar Pistorius]]></category>
								<category domain="people"><![CDATA[Disappearance of Madeleine McCann]]></category>
								<category domain="companies"><![CDATA[Guardian Media Group]]></category>
									</item> 
		 
				<item> 
			<title><![CDATA[Edinburgh University newspaper gagged by own student association]]></title> 
			<link><![CDATA[http://www.themediabriefing.com/article/2013-02-11/edinburgh-university-newspaper-gagged-by-own-student-association]]></link> 
			<description><![CDATA[Edition of the Student carrying an article based on leaked documents was not published after Eusa sought an injunction.]]></description> 
			<pubDate>Tue, May 21st 2013, 04:09 GMT</pubDate> 
			<guid><![CDATA[http://www.themediabriefing.com/article/2013-02-11/edinburgh-university-newspaper-gagged-by-own-student-association]]></guid>
			<source><![CDATA[http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2013/feb/11/student-newspaper-gagged-edinburgh-university]]></source>
															<category domain="companies"><![CDATA[Student newspaper]]></category>
								<category domain="people"><![CDATA[Tony Blair]]></category>
								<category domain="companies"><![CDATA[University of Edinburgh]]></category>
								<category domain="products"><![CDATA[Leeds Student]]></category>
								<category domain="companies"><![CDATA[Guardian Media Group]]></category>
									</item> 
		 
				<item> 
			<title><![CDATA[Doorstepping challenge highlights the ethical dilemmas journalists face]]></title> 
			<link><![CDATA[http://www.themediabriefing.com/article/2012-10-25/doorstepping-challenge-highlights-the-ethical-dilemmas-journalists-face]]></link> 
			<description><![CDATA[Readers were asked how they would deal with a hypothetical situation where a reporter has a chance to break a story.]]></description> 
			<pubDate>Tue, May 21st 2013, 04:09 GMT</pubDate> 
			<guid><![CDATA[http://www.themediabriefing.com/article/2012-10-25/doorstepping-challenge-highlights-the-ethical-dilemmas-journalists-face]]></guid>
			<source><![CDATA[http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2012/oct/25/doorstepping-challenge-ethical-dilemmas-journalists]]></source>
															<category domain="companies"><![CDATA[Foreign and Commonwealth Office]]></category>
								<category domain="companies"><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
								<category domain="companies"><![CDATA[Guardian Media Group]]></category>
								<category domain="companies"><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
								<category domain="products"><![CDATA[Liverpool Daily Post]]></category>
									</item> 
		 
				<item> 
			<title><![CDATA[MPs must not let fear of contempt water down phone hacking report | David Banks]]></title> 
			<link><![CDATA[http://www.themediabriefing.com/article/2012-04-13/mps-must-not-let-fear-of-contempt-water-down-phone-hacking-report-david-banks]]></link> 
			<description><![CDATA[If the media select committee is persuaded to self-censor, it will effectively have rewritten the rules on what is allowed in advance of a trial.]]></description> 
			<pubDate>Tue, May 21st 2013, 04:09 GMT</pubDate> 
			<guid><![CDATA[http://www.themediabriefing.com/article/2012-04-13/mps-must-not-let-fear-of-contempt-water-down-phone-hacking-report-david-banks]]></guid>
			<source><![CDATA[http://www.guardian.co.uk/law/2012/apr/13/media-select-commitee-hacking-contempt]]></source>
															<category domain="companies"><![CDATA[Guardian Media Group]]></category>
								<category domain="companies"><![CDATA[European Court of Human Rights]]></category>
								<category domain="people"><![CDATA[Dominic Grieve]]></category>
								<category domain="people"><![CDATA[Rosemary West]]></category>
								<category domain="companies"><![CDATA[News International]]></category>
									</item> 
		 
				<item> 
			<title><![CDATA[Publishers must show more vigilance to online sectarian hate messages]]></title> 
			<link><![CDATA[http://www.themediabriefing.com/article/2012-03-06/publishers-must-show-more-vigilance-to-online-sectarian-hate-messages]]></link> 
			<description><![CDATA[New Scottish law which takes a hard line on sectarian abuse could result in an English publisher ending up in court.]]></description> 
			<pubDate>Tue, May 21st 2013, 04:09 GMT</pubDate> 
			<guid><![CDATA[http://www.themediabriefing.com/article/2012-03-06/publishers-must-show-more-vigilance-to-online-sectarian-hate-messages]]></guid>
			<source><![CDATA[http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2012/mar/06/publishers-sectarian-hate-messages]]></source>
															<category domain="companies"><![CDATA[Guardian Media Group]]></category>
								<category domain="people"><![CDATA[Gordon Brown]]></category>
								<category domain="companies"><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
								<category domain="companies"><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
									</item> 
		 
				<item> 
			<title><![CDATA[Reporting the UK riots: what are journalists' rights?]]></title> 
			<link><![CDATA[http://www.themediabriefing.com/article/2011-08-09/reporting-the-uk-riots-what-are-journalists-rights]]></link> 
			<description><![CDATA[Reporters are often under pressure from the police during disturbances – but where do they stand under the law?.]]></description> 
			<pubDate>Tue, May 21st 2013, 04:09 GMT</pubDate> 
			<guid><![CDATA[http://www.themediabriefing.com/article/2011-08-09/reporting-the-uk-riots-what-are-journalists-rights]]></guid>
			<source><![CDATA[http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2011/aug/09/reporting-uk-riots-journalists-rights]]></source>
															<category domain="professions"><![CDATA[Journalist]]></category>
								<category domain="companies"><![CDATA[Guardian Media Group]]></category>
									</item> 
		 
				<item> 
			<title><![CDATA[Cameras in court: trial by boredom? | David Banks]]></title> 
			<link><![CDATA[http://www.themediabriefing.com/article/2011-06-02/cameras-in-court-trial-by-boredom-david-banks]]></link> 
			<description><![CDATA[TV should be allowed to show trials. But broadcasters, and viewers, will only be interested in the high-profile cases.]]></description> 
			<pubDate>Tue, May 21st 2013, 04:09 GMT</pubDate> 
			<guid><![CDATA[http://www.themediabriefing.com/article/2011-06-02/cameras-in-court-trial-by-boredom-david-banks]]></guid>
			<source><![CDATA[http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/libertycentral/2011/jun/02/cameras-court-trial-by-boredom]]></source>
															<category domain="people"><![CDATA[Keir Starmer]]></category>
								<category domain="people"><![CDATA[Gavin Millar]]></category>
								<category domain="companies"><![CDATA[Guardian Media Group]]></category>
								<category domain="people"><![CDATA[David Banks]]></category>
								<category domain="professions"><![CDATA[Member of Parliament]]></category>
									</item> 
		 
				<item> 
			<title><![CDATA[Were the media safe to name Ryan Giggs? | David Banks]]></title> 
			<link><![CDATA[http://www.themediabriefing.com/article/2011-05-24/were-the-media-safe-to-name-ryan-giggs-david-banks]]></link> 
			<description><![CDATA[Reports on parliament are given qualified privilege, but it may not offer as much protection as the media think.]]></description> 
			<pubDate>Tue, May 21st 2013, 04:09 GMT</pubDate> 
			<guid><![CDATA[http://www.themediabriefing.com/article/2011-05-24/were-the-media-safe-to-name-ryan-giggs-david-banks]]></guid>
			<source><![CDATA[http://www.guardian.co.uk/law/2011/may/24/media-ryan-giggs-parliamentary-privilege]]></source>
															<category domain="people"><![CDATA[John Hemming]]></category>
								<category domain="people"><![CDATA[Ryan Giggs]]></category>
								<category domain="people"><![CDATA[David Neuberger]]></category>
								<category domain="companies"><![CDATA[Guardian Media Group]]></category>
								<category domain="people"><![CDATA[David Banks]]></category>
									</item> 
		 
				<item> 
			<title><![CDATA[Judgment in contempt case should serve as a shot across the bows | David Banks]]></title> 
			<link><![CDATA[http://www.themediabriefing.com/article/2011-03-04/judgment-in-contempt-case-should-serve-as-a-shot-across-the-bows-david-banks]]></link> 
			<description><![CDATA[Linking to prejudicial past material could damage the integrity of criminal trials, online publishers warned.]]></description> 
			<pubDate>Tue, May 21st 2013, 04:09 GMT</pubDate> 
			<guid><![CDATA[http://www.themediabriefing.com/article/2011-03-04/judgment-in-contempt-case-should-serve-as-a-shot-across-the-bows-david-banks]]></guid>
			<source><![CDATA[http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2011/mar/04/contempt-sun-daily-mail-picture-gun]]></source>
															<category domain="companies"><![CDATA[Associated Newspapers]]></category>
								<category domain="products"><![CDATA[Daily Mail]]></category>
								<category domain="issues"><![CDATA[Prejudice]]></category>
								<category domain="companies"><![CDATA[News International]]></category>
								<category domain="people"><![CDATA[Dominic Grieve]]></category>
									</item> 
		 
				<item> 
			<title><![CDATA[Editorial responsibility and the legal threat of online comments]]></title> 
			<link><![CDATA[http://www.themediabriefing.com/article/2010-10-18/editorial-responsibility-and-the-legal-threat-of-online-comments]]></link> 
			<description><![CDATA[For publishers keen to protect a brand by preventing the use of their messageboards by those posting spam, or offensive content, taking too close a look may well deny them a useful defence against libel]]></description> 
			<pubDate>Tue, May 21st 2013, 04:09 GMT</pubDate> 
			<guid><![CDATA[http://www.themediabriefing.com/article/2010-10-18/editorial-responsibility-and-the-legal-threat-of-online-comments]]></guid>
			<source><![CDATA[http://briefingmedia.wordpress.com/2010/10/18/editorial-responsibility-and-the-legal-threat-of-online-comments/]]></source>
															<category domain="companies"><![CDATA[Demon Internet]]></category>
								<category domain="people"><![CDATA[David Banks]]></category>
									</item> 
		 
	</channel> 
</rss>  